Luxury Box debate goes national
I don't have much time to post today, but I wanted to touch on this quickly...
In case you missed it, Brian from mgoblog dropped some logic (is that a phrase? It is now!) about the Luxury Box issue, stemming from this weekend's New York Times article on the matter. Don't get distracted by Brian's Michigamua reference, my politically-charged friends. Focus on the facts:
1 - Luxury boxes will give Michigan Athletics financial security for decades (decades!) to come.
2 - Older people don't like the idea, younger people do.
Do I really need to say any more? Probably not, but I will one day. Until then, I will reiterate that I'm all for luxury boxes in Michigan Stadium, for all of the reasons that Brian lists (and then some)...
In case you missed it, Brian from mgoblog dropped some logic (is that a phrase? It is now!) about the Luxury Box issue, stemming from this weekend's New York Times article on the matter. Don't get distracted by Brian's Michigamua reference, my politically-charged friends. Focus on the facts:
1 - Luxury boxes will give Michigan Athletics financial security for decades (decades!) to come.
2 - Older people don't like the idea, younger people do.
Do I really need to say any more? Probably not, but I will one day. Until then, I will reiterate that I'm all for luxury boxes in Michigan Stadium, for all of the reasons that Brian lists (and then some)...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home